Abstract
Introduction: Ergonomics of school furniture is a priority issue, since mismatches between desks and children's anthropometric diversity generate forced postures, discomfort and musculoskeletal problems that affect health and performance. In Peru, where obsolete furniture persists, the situation exposes to preventable risks and requires rethinking educational design from an ergonomic approach.
Objective: to describe the relationship between school furniture design and musculoskeletal problems in primary school children, from an ergonomic approach, with special reference to the context of Banda de Shilcayo, Peru.
Method: This literature review was developed using a qualitative approach of documentary analysis, compiling studies and official documents on school furniture, ergonomics and children's musculoskeletal problems, based on searches in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO and Google Scholar.
Development: School furniture has moved from rigid and collective benches to designs that incorporate ergonomic criteria and international standards. However, mismatches persist between the dimensions of the furniture and children's anthropometry, which generates problems with progressive consequences: in the short term they cause discomfort and distraction, in the medium term they generate chronic postural alterations, and in the long term they predispose to lumbago, hernias and scoliosis. Studies in several countries report high rates of mismatch and its association with back pain and risk of spinal deformities.
Conclusions: Incorrectly designed dimensions of school furniture have significant effects on the musculoskeletal health of schoolchildren; they generate immediate discomfort, postural alterations and health risks if not corrected.
References
1. Castellucci HI, Arezes PM, Viviani CA. Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(4):563–8.
2. Nowotny-Czupryna O, Brzek A, Czupryna K, Malicka I, Kowalczyk A, Gzik-Zroska B. Influence of school environment on prevalence of back pain in children and adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2027.
3. Yantoğlu G, Doğan A, Korkmaz A. Ergonomic evaluation of classroom furniture and anthropometric mismatch in Turkish schoolchildren. Work. 2022;71(3):585–92.
4. de Carvalho DE, Soares MM, Moura MF, Ribeiro GM. School furniture and musculoskeletal symptoms in Brazilian children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):431.
5. Sánchez-Ruiz F, López-García M, Hernández-Vega M. Dolor musculoesquelético asociado al mobiliario escolar en niños de primaria en México. Salud Pública Mex. 2020;62(4):456–62.
6. Rodríguez-Romero B, Camargo-Ávila J, Mendoza-Castro M. Ergonomic analysis of classroom furniture and its relationship with musculoskeletal complaints in Colombian schoolchildren. Rev Salud Pública. 2020;22(5):1–10.
7. Ramírez A, Salazar J, Vilchez C. Antropometría y ergonomía en mobiliario escolar de Lima. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Pública. 2019;36(2):263–70.
8. Vásquez L, Huamán R. Evaluación ergonómica del mobiliario en escuelas rurales de Ayacucho. Rev Investig Educ. 2020;34(1):45–54.
9. Ministerio de Educación del Perú. Informe sobre infraestructura y mobiliario escolar en la región San Martín. Lima: MINEDU; 2023.
10. Parcells C, Stommel M, Hubbard RP. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions. J Adolesc Health. 1999;24(4):265–73.
11. Trevelyan FC, Legg SJ. Risk factors associated with back pain in New Zealand school children. Ergonomics. 2010;53(12):1455–64.
12. Milanese S, Grimmer-Somers K. School furniture and the user population: an anthropometric perspective. Ergonomics. 2012;55(2):153–62.
13. Naciones Unidas. Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. ODS 4: Educación de calidad. ONU; 2015. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/education/
14. Straker L, Pollock C, Zubrick SR. The historical evolution of school furniture design. J Educ Hist. 2019;52(2):201–18.
15. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1729-1: Furniture – Chairs and tables for educational institutions – Functional dimensions. Brussels: CEN; 2015.
16. Post-COVID-19 ergonomic school furniture design under fuzzy logic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):1112.
17. Moro T, Baurley S, Helander M, Ayres T, Tadeo L, Santibáñez M, et al. Ergonomic mismatch between school furniture and anthropometric measures of students: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4755.
18. Miletic A, Zanchi J, Andrasevic S, Sklempe Kokic I, Krapac L, Sporis G. Ergonomic school furniture reduces musculoskeletal risk in children: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics. 2021;64(9):1231–42.
19. Dianat I, Karimi MA, Asl Hashemi A, Bahrampour S. Mismatch between school furniture dimensions and children’s anthropometry: the potential risk of musculoskeletal discomfort. Ergonomics. 2013;56(2):243–54.
20. Satir B, Erdoğan FÇ. Comparison of classroom furniture to anthropometric measures of Turkish middle school students. Work. 2021;70(2):493–508.
21. Al-Hazzaa HM. School furniture mismatch and back pain among Saudi intermediate and secondary school girls. Saudi Med J. 2006;27(11):1767–73.
22. Idowu A, Fawole T, Oyekunle R, et al. Mismatch between school furniture dimensions and anthropometric parameters is a risk for spinal deformities in secondary school students in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2023;28:100023.
23. Brewer JM, Davis KG, Dunning KK, Succop PA. Does ergonomic mismatch at school impact pain in school children? Work. 2009;34(4):455–64. doi:10.3233/WOR-2009-0946.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Julia Estefani Cotrina Sinti, Tracy Angelica Oliveira Haro, Katty Marilyn Alegría Lazo (Author)